Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Static and Dynamic Stiffness Testing of Vibration-Damping Machine Mounts

Static and dynamic stiffness testing is the core evaluation method for vibration-damping machine mounts (shock-absorbing leveling mounts), quantifying load-deflection behavior, dynamic-to-static stiffness ratio, and damping characteristics that determine vibration isolation performance. Performed in accordance with standards such as GB/T 15168, ISO 4664-1, and ASTM D5992, this testing supports product design validation, quality control, and third-party certification. This article explains the test principles, sample types, test items, methods, and typical applications in detail.

Technical Overview

Vibration-damping machine mounts, also known as shock-absorbing leveling mounts or anti-vibration machine feet, are elastomer-metal assemblies installed between machinery and its foundation. They combine two functions: precision height adjustment for machine leveling, and vibration isolation through a resilient elastomeric element such as natural rubber, synthetic rubber blends, or rubber-cork composites. Because the performance of these mounts depends on the mechanical behavior of the elastomer, the decisive quality indicators are static stiffness and dynamic stiffness.

Static stiffness is the slope of the force-deflection curve measured under quasi-static compression. It determines how much a mount deflects under the dead weight of the machine, how the static load is distributed among multiple mounts, and whether the machine will remain level and geometrically stable over time.

Dynamic stiffness is measured while the mount is subjected to sinusoidal excitation around a static preload. Due to the viscoelastic nature of rubber, dynamic stiffness depends on excitation frequency and amplitude and is generally higher than static stiffness. It governs the mounted natural frequency of the machine-isolator system and therefore the vibration transmissibility and isolation efficiency. In engineering practice, the dynamic-to-static stiffness ratio is the key acceptance parameter, because an excessive ratio raises the natural frequency and degrades isolation performance.

Dynamic behavior is commonly expressed through the complex stiffness model, where the in-phase component represents the storage stiffness (elastic energy) and the quadrature component represents the loss stiffness (dissipated energy). The ratio of the two gives the loss factor, from which the damping ratio of the system can be derived. Relevant test standards include GB/T 15168 for static and dynamic characteristics of vibration and shock isolators, ISO 4664-1 and ASTM D5992 for dynamic testing of rubber by vibratory methods, and related rubber material standards.

Testing Samples

Wedge-Type Damping Leveling Mounts

Cast or welded wedge bodies with a threaded adjusting screw and an integrated elastomer pad, widely used under lathes, milling machines, machining centers, and grinding machines. The complete assembly, including the elastomer element at its working height, is tested as a functional unit.

Screw-Adjustable Anti-Vibration Machine Feet

Stud-type leveling feet in which a steel base plate carries a bonded rubber foot pad. These are tested at the specified static preload corresponding to the weight supported per foot in service.

Elastomeric Isolation Pads and Blocks

Flat rubber or rubber-cork pads and rectangular elastomer blocks used for heavy machinery, compressors, and generator sets. Specimens are cut or sampled to the required dimensions with parallel loaded surfaces.

Bonded Rubber-to-Metal Mounts

Mounts in which the elastomer is vulcanized directly to metal plates or sleeves, such as conical or bobbin-type elements integrated into leveling systems. Adhesion quality and stiffness are evaluated together on the bonded assembly.

All samples should be representative of series production, free from visible defects, and conditioned at standard laboratory temperature (typically 23 °C ± 5 °C) for at least 16 hours before testing. A minimum of three specimens per configuration is recommended, with five preferred for statistical evaluation.

Testing Items

Typical test items for vibration-damping machine mounts include:

  • Static stiffness (N/mm) over a specified load or deflection interval
  • Static deflection at rated load
  • Dynamic stiffness (storage stiffness) at specified frequency and amplitude
  • Loss stiffness and loss factor (tan δ), and derived damping ratio
  • Dynamic-to-static stiffness ratio
  • Natural (resonance) frequency of the mounted system
  • Ultimate compressive load and safety factor against rated load
  • Compression set and static creep under sustained load
  • Optional items: Shore A hardness (GB/T 531.1), heat aging (GB/T 3512), oil resistance (GB/T 1690), compression set (GB/T 7759.1), and compression fatigue or heat build-up (GB/T 1687)

Testing Methods

Static Stiffness Test

The specimen is placed between parallel platens of a computer-controlled universal testing machine with force verification traceable to ISO 7500-1, using a capacity that covers at least 1.5 to 2 times the rated load. After centering, the specimen is preconditioned with several load cycles to the rated load to eliminate setting effects and the initial softening behavior of the elastomer. The load is then applied at a constant crosshead speed, typically 5 to 10 mm/min, up to the specified maximum, while the force-deflection curve is recorded continuously.

Static stiffness is calculated as the secant slope between two defined load points, commonly between 30 % and 70 % of the rated load, or over a deflection interval defined in the product specification. The static deflection at rated load is read directly from the curve. Individual values, mean values, and scatter among specimens are reported.

Dynamic Stiffness Test — Direct Forcing Method

Testing is carried out on a servo-hydraulic or electrodynamic test system equipped with force and displacement transducers, following the general principles of GB/T 15168, ISO 4664-1, and ASTM D5992. A static preload equal to the rated working load is first applied, and a sinusoidal displacement excitation is superimposed on it. Typical test conditions include fixed frequencies such as 5, 10, 20, and 50 Hz or a swept sine from 5 to 200 Hz, with dynamic amplitudes of about 0.05 to 0.5 mm, corresponding to a shear or compressive strain amplitude representative of service conditions.

The acquired force and displacement signals are processed by phase-sensitive analysis to separate the in-phase (storage) and quadrature (loss) components of the complex stiffness. The loss factor is calculated as the ratio of loss stiffness to storage stiffness, and the damping ratio is derived from it. Temperature must be controlled and recorded, because elastomer dynamic properties are temperature dependent.

Dynamic Stiffness Test — Resonance Method

In the indirect method, the mount supports a rigid mass of known value on an excitation table. A frequency sweep identifies the resonance frequency of the single-degree-of-freedom system, and the dynamic stiffness is back-calculated from the mass and the measured natural frequency. The damping ratio is determined from the half-power bandwidth of the resonance peak or from the transmissibility curve. This method is useful for verifying overall isolation system behavior and cross-checking direct method results.

Data Processing and Evaluation

The dynamic-to-static stiffness ratio is computed from the mean dynamic and static stiffness values. For natural rubber mounts, ratios between about 1.2 and 1.8 are typical, while many product specifications require the ratio not to exceed approximately 2.0, or require compliance with the value agreed in the purchase specification. Evaluation also includes uniformity of stiffness among specimens, usually within ±15 % to ±20 % of the nominal value, and the full force-deflection and dynamic stiffness-frequency curves are included in the report.

Applications

Static and dynamic stiffness testing of vibration-damping mounts is applied across the machinery industry:

  • Machine tool installation: verification of mounts for lathes, milling machines, machining centers, surface grinders, and EDM equipment, where leveling stability and vibration isolation directly affect geometric accuracy and surface finish
  • Precision measurement equipment: isolation mounts for coordinate measuring machines, optical instruments, and laboratory balances
  • Forming and impact equipment: heavy-duty damping mounts for mechanical and hydraulic presses, shears, and forging hammers
  • General industrial equipment: mounts for compressors, generators, pumps, fans, and HVAC units
  • Design and development: characterization of new elastomer compounds, comparison of frequency- and amplitude-dependent behavior, and validation of simulation models
  • Quality control and certification: factory outgoing inspection, incoming inspection by equipment builders, and independent type testing by accredited third-party laboratories for tender qualification or market entry

FAQ

What is the difference between static and dynamic stiffness?

Static stiffness is measured under slow, quasi-static compression and describes load-deflection behavior under the machine weight. Dynamic stiffness is measured under oscillating excitation superimposed on a preload and describes the mount response to vibration. Because rubber is viscoelastic, dynamic stiffness varies with frequency and amplitude and is normally higher than static stiffness.

Why does dynamic stiffness matter for isolation performance?

The mounted natural frequency is determined by the dynamic stiffness and the supported mass. Effective vibration isolation requires the excitation frequency to be sufficiently above this natural frequency. If the dynamic-to-static ratio is too high, the natural frequency rises and isolation efficiency drops, even if the static stiffness appears satisfactory.

What dynamic-to-static stiffness ratio is acceptable?

Values between 1.2 and 1.8 are typical for conventional rubber mounts. Many specifications require the ratio not to exceed approximately 2.0, but the exact limit depends on the product standard, the elastomer compound, and the agreement between manufacturer and purchaser.

How many samples are required for testing?

A minimum of three specimens per mount type is recommended, and five is preferred so that mean values and scatter can be evaluated reliably. Specimens must be conditioned at laboratory temperature before testing, and tested in the same orientation and at the same working height as in service.

What is included in the test report?

A professional report includes sample identification and dimensions, applicable standards, equipment and calibration status, test conditions such as preload, frequency, amplitude and temperature, force-deflection curves, dynamic stiffness results, loss factor and damping ratio, the calculated dynamic-to-static stiffness ratio, and a clear statement of conformity with the acceptance criteria.

Which standards govern this testing?

The principal references are GB/T 15168 for static and dynamic characteristics of vibration and shock isolators, ISO 4664-1 and ASTM D5992 for the dynamic properties of rubber by vibratory methods, and supporting rubber material standards such as GB/T 531.1, GB/T 7759.1, GB/T 3512, and GB/T 1690 for hardness, compression set, heat aging, and oil resistance.

Why Choose ZKGX?

  • State-of-the-art analytical equipment
  • Highly qualified scientific team
  • Fast turnaround time
  • Competitive pricing